Wednesday, 9 March 2016

QUERIES ON PROPERTY MATTERS


Certain hidden facts like pending cases, prior agreements, government notifications of the property cannot be traced out easily by verification of the documents.  How can these hidden factors be uncovered, and what should a purchaser do to protect himself against these hidden factors?          

Generally seller hands over the copies of the property documents to the purchaser to examine the title.  Such documents contain only title documents, which may be cross-checked in the sub registrar’s Office.  But they do not disclose any pending litigations, prior agreements which are not registered and government notifications.  As such, the Purchaser should be very cautious and make arrangements for thorough search of records at the concerned jurisdictional Courts to rule out the possibility of any pending cases and also in offices of Urban Development Authorities such as : BDA, BMRDA, KIADB, KHB, High way and other planning authorities etc., to rule out the acquisition notifications, if any.

Further, it would be difficult to verify any existing prior agreements or arrangements which are not registered.  As such, proper enquiries with owner of the property, and also with neighbours may be helpful.  It would always be better to register the sale agreement and get the property registered at the earliest.  Above all, Paper publication of the intention of the Purchaser to buy particular property would help the purchaser to a certain extent. 

What is Paper publication? How does it benefit the purchaser

Though the Paper Publication may not be a statutory requirement, yet the idea of getting a notice published in the widely circulated newspaper in the locality, is to elicit the information from the general public that a bona fide purchaser is intending to purchase the property from its owner.  Besides this, the paper notification also invites objections from various interested persons with documentary evidence in support of their claim within the specific period.

Even after issuance of such paper notification, a person said to have his claim to the property does not lose his rights just because he could not disclose his rights in response to such paper notification within the given time.

I am not able to understand the difference between Khatha Certificate and Khatha extract.  Would you please enlighten me on this ? Could you also brief me about the importance of Encumbrance Certificate ?

Khatha is a revenue record maintained by the municipal authorities in respect of a property standing in the name of a particular person for purposes of assessment and collection of property tax.  As it is a secondary document in the absence of primary documents like Sale Deed, Gift Deed, Partition Deed, Release Deed, Will, Grant etc., however it does not establish the title in its totality.

Khatha Certificate is a Certificate issued by the Municipal authority Office confirming that the Khatha of a particular property stands in the name of a particular person/s.

Khatha Extract is an Extract of the tax assessment register maintained at Municipal Office giving complete details of the property like: Area of the site, building, property tax levied, cess and total tax payable, name of the previous and present owner of the property, etc.

Encumbrance Certificate is issued by Sub Registrar Offices for a specific period as required by the applicant.  It contain the details of the property like: Sy. No. House No. boundaries, and encumbrances on such property like: Sale, Gift, transfer, mortgage, if any, which are registered at the said sub registrar’s office.  However, the Encumbrance Certificate do not reflect the encumbrance transactions of deeds which are not registered.

What is the procedure for Khatha transfer and how do we know that the Khatha transfer Certificate is genuine and original

Transfer of Khatha of property to your name is to be done by the concerned jurisdictional revenue authority under whose jurisdiction the property is situated.  For this purpose, you have to apply for transfer of khatha in a duly filled Khatha Transfer application duly signed by both the Seller as well as Purchaser i.e., yourself, and enclose a copy of the registered Sale Deed, latest tax paid receipt and up to date encumbrance certificate along with the necessary fee.

Thereafter, the authorities do acknowledge receipt of the application and indicate the date by which the process will be completed; however, the entire process is to be required to be completed within 45 days.  Meanwhile, the authorities may also call for certain additional information / document etc., if felt necessary for verification and confirmation.  Thereafter, the Khatha of the property would be transferred into your name and an endorsement will be issued in your name to this effect.  Thereafter, tax paid receipts on such property would be issued in your name, which show that the said property stands in your name.

As regards ascertaining whether the Khatha Certificate issued is genuine and original or not, the Khatha Certificate is usually issued by the concerned jurisdictional Corporation Office and as such you may directly visit such office and obtain the same to confirm its genuineness and originality.     

Do the financial institutions permit the transfer of loan from one institution to other and what is the fee charged for such transfer and whether it would be better to transfer from one institution to other ?                                    

Financial Institutions allow the transfer of loan from one institution to another even though they don’t want their existing loan accounts to be taken over by other institutions.  However, such institution which allow transfer of loan account may charge foreclosure charges for such transaction in order to minimize such transfer of loan accounts.  It is left to the customer as to when to transfer the loan from one institution to another taking into consideration various factors of which the major point is to look into the rate of interest besides other benefits which he would get from other institution on such transfer.After obtaining in-principle approval from the taking over institution or bank, such transfer of loan account is possible.

 More,

Tuesday, 8 March 2016

PROPOSED CESS TO INCREASE THE COST OF YOUR PROPERTY



Buying plots or homes from private realtors in and around Bengaluru is set to get costlier. The state government has proposed a 2% cess on the market value of fresh layouts to implement projects for the Ring Road, drinking water, rapid transit and slum development (0.5% each). The levy will be only for private layouts.
“The BDA has submitted a proposal, and it’s before the urban development secretary”

The BDA came up with the proposal because its earlier one -to levy a 5% Metro cess on the market value of fresh land development -was turned down by the Karnataka High Court, which termed it exorbitant. The new proposal has been drafted keeping in mind the court’s directive, he added.

The state government has been collecting cess for the city’s infrastructure development by charging Re 1 on every litre of fuel sold in the state. Almost a fourth of property tax is collected through cess: health (15%), library (6%) and beggary (3%). The BDA had levied several cesses while granting sanction for layouts, but many developers defaulted on payment. Under the new proposal, the cess will have to be paid at the time of approval of the layout plan,” said a officer of the state urban development department.

Private developers are not happy .“The government is al ready losing on property registrations with the increase in registration fee and stamp duty . This will make it worse,” says RM Somashekar, a leading private-layout developer. “`The cess will a big blow for the realty sector,” says S Krishnamurthy ,a developer in Yelahanka.

More,

Monday, 7 March 2016

INTEREST IN YOUR DREAM HOME GETS A HIGH FIVE


If your builder doesn’t give you possession of that dream house within the promised three years. For, the 2016-17 Budget proposes tax relief on interest payment on home loan if he property bought, or under construction, is completed within 5 years from the end of the financial year in which he loan was availed instead f the current 3 years.

The relief, under Section 4 of I-T Act, could help save ax up to Rs 60,000 per annum.In a further boost to the affordable segment, FM Arun Jaitey also proposed to allow eduction for additional inerest of Rs 50,000 per annum or loans up to Rs 35 lakh sanctioned during the next financial year for first-time home-buyers, provided the value of the house doesn’t exeed Rs 50 lakh.

Assuming a loan of Rs 35 akh to be paid over 20 years, he annual deduction comes around Rs 2.5 lakh, includng the Rs 2 lakh currently available. At 9%, the interest utgo in the first year would e Rs 3.12 lakh. So, the buyer will save Rs 75,000 if he is in 30% tax-bracket, bringing own the effective interest rate in the first year to 6.8%. For the first seven years, he interest outgo will remain bove Rs 2.5 lakh and, so, the buyer will continue to get an annual tax benefit of Rs 75,000.

For employees who don’t get HRA benefits, the FM raised the deduction against house rent from Rs 2,000 per month to Rs 5,000. This would result in tax savings in the range of Rs 3,708 to Rs 12,204, depending on the income slab.

More,

Friday, 4 March 2016

NEW DIVIDEND TAX MAY NOT HIT PROMOTERS MUCH



The additional 10% tax on dividend income announced in the Budget would not pinch many wealthy promoter groups after all. Promoters of several blue chips hold only a small stake in their individual capacity , through HUFs (Hindu undivided families) and partnership firms controlled by them, which come under the new tax.

For instance, 17.39% of promoter stake in IT major Wipro is owned by the Azim Premji trust. The company has paid a dividend of Rs 12 per share so far in 2015-16, earning the trust about Rs 516 crore in dividend income.

Trusts and holding companies would not attract the proposed additional tax on dividend, experts said. If Wipro maintains the payout at the same level in 2016-17, the dividend that the trust receives would still remain tax-free.

Similarly , about 43% of promoter holding in Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone is also held in a family trust. An employee welfare fund and trusts own 14.17% in automobiles major Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M). This is more than half of the promoter holding in M&M.

Tata Sons, which is the holding company of most listed companies in the Tata Group, would be exempt from the new tax on dividend, the experts said. Tata Sons has earned nearly Rs 2,382 crore in dividend from IT behemoth Tata Consultancy Services alone so far in 2015-16. Tata Sons has a 73.26% stake in TCS.

The Budget said that “tax at the rate of 10% of gross amount of dividend will be payable by the recipients, that is, individuals, HUFs and firms receiving dividend in excess of (Rs) 10 lakh per annum“. K S Ravichandran, founder of company secretaries firm KSR & Co, said, “Trusts (in companies) have been created for the purpose of family settlements and would be outside the purview of the additional dividend tax.“

The rule is, however, open for interpretation and could result in litigation, tax experts said. For instance, courts had ruled in the past that taxes can be imposed on individuals in trusts where the share of the beneficiaries is fixed, experts said.
The promoter holding in Reliance Industries is held mostly through limited liability partnerships (LLPs), which experts said would attract the new 10% levy . “The LLP (limited liability partnership) holding structure has been used by some promoters. So, they could be impacted by the additional burden,“ said Rajesh H Gandhi, partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP . Reliance’s `Petroleum Trust’ holds 3.84% in the company , which would be exempt from tax.

The government has not removed or reduced the dividend distribution tax (DDT) borne by companies paying the dividend, which stands at 20%.

More,


Thursday, 3 March 2016

BANK GUARANTEE CAN SAVE YOUR PROPERTY FROM ATTACHMENT


If there’s a dispute over taxes, there’s now a way for a company to prevent its property being attached. It can give a bank guarantee to the tax officer to prevent property, such as a factory, from being attached during the course of a tax assessment.

The Budget proposals provide that a tax official can revoke an order for provisional attachment of the property if the taxpayer furnishes a bank guarantee equal to the fair market value of the property, or of an amount sufficient to protect the interests of the revenue authorities. Within 15 days of receipt of the bank guarantee, or within 45 days if the case has been referred to a valuation officer, the order for attaching the property is to be revoked. This proposal will come in force from June 1, 2016.

Business entities operating in India, often find that their property, such as an office or a factory building, is attached by the tax authorities during the course of assessment. For instance, operations froze at Nokia’s manufacturing facility near Chennai after it was attached by tax authorities in 2013. More recently, when Vodafone received a fresh tax demand of Rs 14,200 crore, the notice also said that Vodafone’s assets in India could be seized if the disputed demand was not paid.

A high-level committee led by Justice Easwar had pointed out that tax officials have the power to provisionally attach a taxpayer’s assets, with the permission of higher level authorities, if it was necessary to protect the interests of the tax de partment. Such attachment is supposed to be temporary -six to 24 months. However, in many cases, the taxpayer files a writ, or approaches the Authority for Advance Ruling and obtains a stay on regular assessment. This prolongs the duration of the assessment and the property remains attached causing disruption in business operations.The Budget proposals have taken the recommendations of this committee into consideration.


More,

Wednesday, 2 March 2016

REALTY CHEQUE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

REALTY CHEQUE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING


Builders Pay No Tax For 300 Sq Ft Flats In Metros, 600 Sq Ft In Non-Metros
It’s a mixed bag for the real estate sector. The biggest bonanza is for Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITS) which are now exempt from paying the 17% dividend distribution tax (DDT) when they hand out dividends to investors.

Jaitley announced total tax exemption on profits for developers who build small flats. The Centre also announced service tax exemption for construction of affordable housing under state and central housing schemes. Builders will enjoy 100% tax exemption on profits if they build apartments up to 300 sq ft in size in the four major metro cities and up to 600 sq ft in the non-metros. These flats have to be built starting June 2016 and completed by March 2019.

“This will give much-needed impetus to develop a greater number of affordable housing projects across the country, thus, directly aligning the agenda with the Prime Minister’s vision of ‘Housing for All’,” said Abhishek Lodha, MD, Lodha Group.

Dharmesh Jain, president of MCHI-CREDAI, said, “We are yet to read the fine print, but at this point in time, we are very excited about tax exemptions for affordable housing.“

But developer Niranjan Hiranandani said the earlier NDA government had given tax exemptions on flats up to 1,000 sq ft in Mumbai and 1,500 sq ft in other areas. “It’s unfair to reduce the size to 300 sq ft and 600 sq ft,” he said.

Sanjay Dutt, MD-India, Cushman & Wakefield, said the caveat of hous ing space limits (300 sq ft in four metro cities and 600 sq ft in other tier II cities) should have been equitable. “The three-year window for project completion could also have been for a longer duration as approvals and construction typically take a long time,” he added.

Property expert Pranay Vakil of Praron Consultancy said developers building smaller flats will still have to pay the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) of 18% on their book profit.
“This will negate some of the benefits offered in the budget,” said Vakil.
However, sceptics warned that many builders in the past have cheated government housing authorities by amalgamating two or four smallsized flats and selling them as one big unit. The scrapping of the dividend distribution tax (DDT) which was paid by Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) has been the biggest takeaway for the industry. “This was the last-mile connectivity remaining for REITs,’’ said Hiranandani. “In the next 18 months, I expect up to $ 20 billion flowing into India by this route,” he added.

Tuesday, 1 March 2016

BOUNCED CHEQUES

BOUNCED CHEQUES



1 Bounced cheques A cheque “bounces“ when the bank where the issuer of the cheque has an account does not honour it.

2 Cheques are dishonoured by the bank if there are insufficient funds, a signature mismatch, overwriting or a stale date.

3 Banks charge a penalty for bounced cheques. The fee varies from bank to bank and based on customer catergorisation within a bank.

4 A bounced cheque can adversely impact the defaulter’s credit history and credit score.

5 The payee can take legal action against the issuer of the cheque for wilfully issuing an instrument that did not represent valid payment.

6 If the issued cheque is against a donation or gift, there is no valid con sideration and no legal recourse is available if such cheques bounce.